IRC Logs

Network: freenode Channel: #cisco

	Enter your search terms Submit search form
	Web www.irclog.org

[18:50]<pzt00>hmmm, bad ISP....
[18:50]<pzt00>i hope noone answered yet
[18:59]<rrsnd>Does it matter if I use straight through or patch cables to the Gi uplink ports on a 2960 or does it figure it out automatically?
[19:01]<vd2r>depends on what you are connecting.
[19:01]<fjzvxnz>i think the gige specification calls for auto MDI/X, but I don't remember.
[19:02]<ddaay>good info on cisco about this at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5207/products_features_guide09186a00801a75a7.html
[19:02]<ddaay>now i just need to learm some tcl
[19:03]<ddaay>thanks fr500 and loather
[19:03]<fjzvxnz>welcome.
[19:04]<rrsnd>tmbg: to a Summit48i
[19:05]<rrsnd>ahh ok, it sais MDI-X I think, just wasn't sure if that's what it meant.
[19:05]<rrsnd>We used to have a linksys 24-port, and it worked with straightthrough cabling.
[19:05]<rrsnd>then we put in a 2950 24-port, and had to change to crossovers
[19:06]<rrsnd>just switched it out for a 2960 48-port.
[19:12]<vd2r>http://show.imagehosting.us/show/1367434/0/nouser_1367/T0_-1_1367434.JPG <--- the red boxes require crossover cables.
[19:13]<vd2r>I think for the switch to switch bit that's switchport to switchport not uplinks though. all of my uplinks are fiber so it's easy for me to roll though so I don't worry about it much.
[19:14]<fjzvxnz>all my uplinks at home are fiber as well
[19:16]<rrsnd>the datacenter provides 100mb/s copper feeds, not fiber
[19:16]<rrsnd>Timeout on server Connection was to show.imagehosting.us at port 80
[19:19]<vd2r>try http://server6.theimagehosting.com/image.php?img=crossovers.JPG
[19:20]<2gzgzjvx>i need help configuring a c3640 using dialer profiles to accept more than one call at the same time. currently when a 2nd call comes in the debug output displays "Di0: Load balancing not supported, rejecting call". here is my config: http://rafb.net/paste/results/JNrw5m76.html and the debug output: http://rafb.net/paste/results/dX9Usb22.html please help
[19:20]<vd2r>bahaha. my link is NSFW though. has damn sex ads (no pictures, just text)
[19:21]<[mzvzyw]>You usually set up a dialer profile for each caller
[19:23]<2gzgzjvx>[Matrix]: how has this to be configured? currently I have 4 "incoming" dialer profiles Di0-Di3 but the router uses only the last one (Di3)
[19:24]<2gzgzjvx>the other ones are not used so something what I don't know is missing :)
[19:25]<[mzvzyw]>should have a "dialer remote-name asdf" where asdf is the hostname on the remote router
[19:25]<[mzvzyw]>and it'll match the caller to the correct profile
[19:26]<2gzgzjvx>[Matrix]: the "remote" devices are payment terminals which don't have a hostname, in addition the dialer profiles are for x.25
[19:26]<pzt00>i have a 4 port FXO card on a cisco 2800, i set up destination-patern ... to go to one port. is it possible to assign the port dynamically?
[19:26]<[mzvzyw]>bleh
[19:26]<[mzvzyw]>wow, I don't know then. heh
[19:26]<pzt00>one of the 4 ports
[19:27]<2gzgzjvx>[Matrix]: sh**... thanks anyway.
[19:27]<2gzgzjvx>anybody else knows dialer profiles and x.25??
[19:33]<gjsw>Hey guys, quick question. Is there a good traffic generator application to help test QoS and ACL rules?
[19:34]<gjsw>Like set the tcp/udp options, ip header options, size, and amount/sec to generate.
[19:34]<pzt00>can i set up a voice destination pattern to go out from the first available port?
[19:45]<rfv>fr500: create a dial-peer for each port but put the same destination-pattern into it
[19:45]<rfv>you can change the order using the preference command.
[19:46]<vcul>nosx, you can try hping.org (hping3)
[20:03]<fdzjd> Does someone here ever run freeradius with Mysql and can get the cisco Av-Pairs attributes working. With a AS5350?
[20:04]<2zdsnpzz>Man, I hate the names of the ASes...
[20:04]<2zdsnpzz>AS<number> is a AS number, not a networking device. ;)
[20:24]<vd2r>fbh: them saying 2-4 months means it will either take 2 weeks or 6 months.
[20:31]<sjpnprpm>good morning. is anyone here familiar with the new ASA 5500 boxes?
[20:32]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>never used one :\
[20:32]<sjpnprpm>well, i guess it is not really related to ASA and may apply to something else...
[20:35]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>What's the problem?
[20:36]<sjpnprpm>basically we have 3 subnets from a provider. outside facing /29. and 2 /28
[20:37]<sjpnprpm>lets say 10.1.1.155/29 is our outside interface
[20:38]<sjpnprpm>so provider did "ip route 20.2.2.96/28 10.1.1.155 on their end assuming we have a router...
[20:38]<sjpnprpm>we dont. so now i have to get this going through ASA somehow
[20:38]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>as far as i know ASAs can do routing. They run something similar to pix os
[20:39]<sjpnprpm>so i will have to add a static route for each ip in /28 ?
[20:39]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>no, you just need to turn on IP routing in the appliance
[20:40]<sjpnprpm>hm.. i need to RTFM a little then ;) i am network illiterate
[20:40]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>networking can be difficult, especially to someone who doesn't know much about it :)
[20:41]<sjpnprpm>well, i know some.. i took CCNA class couple of years ago, but haven't touched a singe cisco box since
[20:42]<sjpnprpm>i just dont remember half of the terms and explaining a problem to someone may be difficult at times :)
[20:43]<msxjv>sup
[20:45]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>yeah, its hard to keep skills sharp without using them frequently
[20:45]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>yo, dshot.
[20:46]<msxjv>yeah, like say perhaps at a crap company where said skills would be like dropping a nuclear bomb on a shanty town uprising
[20:46]<msxjv>hey, how are you
[20:46]<[mzvzyw]>Yeah, after a few years getting rusty your skillset wouldn't even have an edge... ;)
[20:47]<[mzvzyw]>I hate RIP.
[20:47]<msxjv>lol, why's that?
[20:47]<vcul>i don't see any reason not to
[20:48]<[mzvzyw]>Because it's not OSPF.
[20:48]<msxjv>you don't like all the nuances of a classful protocol?
[20:48]<[mzvzyw]>Every time someone uses RIP, a fairy dies.
[20:48]<msxjv>I concur.
[20:49]<[mzvzyw]>Well, to be honest, RIPv2 isn't THAT terrible for a VERY small network, but meh...
[20:50]<[mzvzyw]>iBGP for teh win.
[20:50]<[mzvzyw]>;)
[20:50]<msxjv>You might run into RIP in some niches, but yeah, you can avoid it entirely 99% of the time.
[20:51]<[mzvzyw]>While I'm bitching, I might as well add that IS-IS can suck it.
[20:51]<msxjv>heh, at this friend of mine's job ( this is where I pretend it's a friends job ), they had Motorola routers from 1993
[20:51]<msxjv>RIP only
[20:54]<mw9>R.I.P
[20:54]<[mzvzyw]>Every time someone uses IS-IS, uhh... well... their network is probably too.... ummm.. messed up.
[20:55]<[mzvzyw]>ouch
[20:57]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>my mom's on the intarwebz, so somewhere in her intarawebz travels, i bet she's used is-is indeirectly :D
[20:57]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>FBH^: 3005? 3030?
[20:57]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>and yeah, it is ridiculously simple.
[20:57]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>sadly, the GUI web based config thing is really the only usable way to configure it
[20:57]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>the CLI is menu-driven, and well, sucks
[20:58]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>it really is that simple
[20:58]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>unless you get into things like certificate-based auth and whatnot
[20:58]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>but that's almost too much of a pain in the ass to make it worthwhile
[20:58]<zzd-2zz>hello
[21:00]<fjzvxnz-wjzc>routers can do traffic shaping.
[21:00]<[mzvzyw]>traffic shaping deals with frame relay
[21:03]<snppysx>nah, you can use traffic shaping on alot of traffic, not just frame
[21:04]<snppysx>http://www.networkworld.com/research/2006/050806-wan-test-expand.html
[21:05]<vcul>well, you can get in trouble when FR discards your traffic without having to counter it. traffic shaping is a must with FR
[21:06]<snppysx>fbh, its just an example of a traffic shaping appliance
[21:06]<[mzvzyw]>well yeah, technically you use traffic shaping all over the place in the form of QoS, policies, and fair queue
[21:08]<snppysx>weird, still works for me

Back to #cisco
Or go to some related logs:
#gentoo
#python
#blender
#gentoo
#debian