IRC Logs

Network: freenode Channel: #cisco

	Enter your search terms Submit search form
	Web www.irclog.org

[20:24]<gnvvyn>danshtr the uplaod is going at 28KB/sec and the voice is choppy I Wpould prefer the upload go at 8KB/sec and the voice be perfect :)
[20:24]<gnvvyn>danshtr during the uplaod?
[20:25]<mzgsxvz>nettie: the the problem might not be your router configs
[20:26]<mzgsxvz>nettie: are you using vpn for voice?
[20:26]<gnvvyn>danshtr: no, just straight to the asterisk server at colo
[20:26]<qwnff>nettie: help a brother out, eh? http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=6859 :P
[20:27]<gnvvyn>danshtr: the router config is pretty plain just simple nat overload, no vpn, no filrewall nothing., just to keep things as simple as possible
[20:28]<gnvvyn>Qwell I'm sorry I only use IAX and SIP for vocie :(
[20:28]<qwnff>even on the ccm server? ;/
[20:28]<gnvvyn>Qwell I dont have one :)
[20:28]<qwnff>well, hell :p
[20:28]<gnvvyn>ehehe
[20:29]<gnvvyn>danshtr: the point is that when I dont upload and the link is free the voice is great! but really great!
[20:29]<gnvvyn>danshtr: when I upload the quality gets worse. I Can reproduce that with both codecs g711u and g729a, same problem..
[20:31]<gnvvyn>danshtr the g729a considering the very small footprint seems much more susceptible to choppy voice quality, the g711u has bigger footprint and maybe needing more bandwith it "seem" to be more aggressive taking bandwidth..
[20:31]<gnvvyn>seem=seems
[20:36]<gnvvyn>sh policy-map interface di0 shows an offered rate od 236Kbit for the class-default and a rate of 26000 for the voice class.
[20:37]<gnvvyn>26Kbit
[20:39]<gnvvyn>that's fine if I would exchange data using tcp or for general traffic. For voice of course is not acceptable because the uplink reach the maximum load and the latency goes up and make the calls choppy
[20:47]<kz0gvr2>how ya doin f0lks
[20:47]<gndyvx>morn
[20:47]<kz0gvr2>:-)
[20:48]<jygc>evenin
[20:53]<gnvvyn>damn I giveup :(
[20:54]<jygc>Hm
[20:54]<jygc>Is there any differences (other than currency conversion) between emea and US GPL prices ?
[20:57]<mzgsxvz>nettie: port you show policy-m di0
[20:57]<mzgsxvz>i mean post
[20:57]<cucx>what should I do, that the cisco will route between VLAN's ?
[20:58]<mzgsxvz>CukX: which model?
[20:59]<cucx>3550
[20:59]<cucx>should the vlan interface be up ?
[20:59]<mzgsxvz>CukX: yes
[20:59]<mzgsxvz>it should
[20:59]<cucx>eg. added to a certaint port and that port should be up
[21:00]<cucx>aha, ok
[21:00]<kz0gvr2>CukX, both vlan interfaces should be up... and you need to make sure routing is turned on
[21:00]<gnvvyn>danshtr ok
[21:00]<cucx>Kr0ntab where do i do that ?
[21:00]<kz0gvr2>Switch(config)#ip routing
[21:01]<gnvvyn>danshtr: show policy-map di0 is empty
[21:01]<cucx>aha... it works now
[21:01]<cucx>TNX !
[21:01]<mzgsxvz>i mean : show policy-map interface di0
[21:02]<kz0gvr2>np
[21:02]<gnvvyn>danshtr http://pastebin.com/741470
[21:05]<mzgsxvz>nemith: port all you config
[21:05]<mzgsxvz>i'll be back in 45 min
[21:06]<gnvvyn>ok
[21:06]<gnvvyn>thanc
[21:06]<gnvvyn>thanx
[21:18]<cucx>Kr0ntab still here ?
[21:18]<kz0gvr2>yup
[21:19]<cucx>can you point me to, how to create a bandwidth shape for let's say, one IP on 3550 ?
[21:19]<cucx>Kr0ntab or bw limit, whatever is used terminology in Cisco world :D
[21:19]<ygpjvnc9ww>anyone know where i can find an example usage of qos pre-classify on 12.4 with ipsec?
[21:20]<kz0gvr2>it gets a little complicated... but witth the right IOS image.. it supports qos command sets...
[21:21]<kz0gvr2>what image are you using?
[21:21]<ygpjvnc9ww>CukX: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6350/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080465b25.html
[21:21]<cucx>EMI image... with ipservices
[21:22]<kz0gvr2>sh version for exact software version
[21:22]<cucx>System image file is "flash:/c3550-ipservices-mz.122-25.SEC2.bin"
[21:23]<cucx>Cisco IOS Software, C3550 Software (C3550-IPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(25)SEC2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
[21:23]<kz0gvr2>cool... do you have a CCO account?
[21:24]<kz0gvr2>to log into Cisco's web site?
[21:25]<cucx>hm... i have one as a partner
[21:25]<kz0gvr2>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/switches/ps646/products_configuration_guide_book09186a00804722e5.html
[21:25]<cucx>not as CCNA or CCND or something, if they have some special access
[21:25]<cucx>yep, that works
[21:25]<kz0gvr2>cool
[21:26]<cucx>what should it be at ? qos ?
[21:26]<kz0gvr2>everything you need to know.. plus examples
[21:26]<kz0gvr2>yup
[21:28]<ygpjvnc9ww>ftp://www.jasonellison.net/pub/qchpolsh.pdf
[21:28]<ygpjvnc9ww>CukX: ftp://www.jasonellison.net/pub/qchpolsh.pdf
[21:28]<ygpjvnc9ww>CukX: i put that chapter on my ftp
[21:29]<cucx>infotek411 tnx
[21:29]<ygpjvnc9ww>CukX: QOS: Policing and Shaping Overview
[21:29]<ygpjvnc9ww>anyone know where i can find an example usage of qos pre-classify on 12.4 with ipsec?
[21:44]<ygpjvnc9ww>the pre-classify is getting me
[21:45]<dracyf>Hi, I have strange behavior on network. Some access ports with PC connected has in show spanning-tree Type: P2p and some of them Type: Edge P2p
[21:46]<dracyf>problem is, when PC which port has type "P2p" reconnected, it sends over network "STP: VLAN0015 Topology Change rcvd" message
[21:46]<dracyf>I have on access port "bpduguard enabled"
[21:47]<dracyf>Question is, why is on some ports type "Edge P2p" and on others "P2p"
[21:47]<dracyf>is possible to set this type manually ?
[22:10]<dracyf>Kr0ntab: ?
[22:10]<kz0gvr2>?
[22:10]<kz0gvr2>oh... i messaged ya by accident
[22:11]<kz0gvr2>sorry mate
[22:11]<dracyf>Kr0ntab: you're writing me pmsg
[22:11]<dracyf>ok
[22:12]<kz0gvr2>btw... are you using portfast on each of your end user interfaces?
[22:12]<dracyf>Kr0ntab: yes
[22:13]<ygpjvnc9ww>anyone know where i can find an example usage of qos pre-classify on 12.4 with ipsec?
[22:14]<kz0gvr2>majkil, MST? PVST+?
[22:14]<dracyf>ehhh...strange, on this one switch I misslooked..now I see I forgot set portfast
[22:14]<kz0gvr2>yup
[22:14]<dracyf>sorry, my mistake

Back to #cisco
Or go to some related logs:
#blender
#ubuntu
#suse
#netbsd
#debian