IRC Networks
Irc Logs Stats
Start date: 2007-09-27 02:48:27
Last update: 2008-10-24 20:19:38
Channels: 41
Logged Lines: 6230436
Size: 1834.18 MB
Powered by
Channel Info
Network: freenodeChannel: #cisco |
Search in www.irclog.org
Log from #cisco at freenode 2006-05-28
[01:56]<gndyvx>oh mlppp
[01:57]<fjzvxnz>those are just backhauled to the 2600 sitting above it over two 1
[01:57]<fjzvxnz>' pieces of shielded cat5
[01:59]<xud2jfv>nemith: so on ppp multilinks turn off fair-queue?
[01:59]<mrxmjum>hello, what's the default voilation action for port-security?
[01:59]<znzwzzn>fellaz
[01:59]<fjzvxnz>Mahmoud: errdisable, if i remember right
[01:59]<gndyvx>block i belive
[01:59]<mrxmjum>loather, so it's shutdown then. since shutdown will put it in errdisable. thanks :)
[02:00]<mrxmjum>hmmm blockle the whole port = shutdown = errdisab
[02:00]<mrxmjum>hmmm block the whole port = shutdown = errdisable
[02:00]<fjzvxnz>no, it is block.
[02:00]<gndyvx>ah shutdwon is the default
[02:00]<mrxmjum>actions are shutdown, protect and restrict
[02:00]<gndyvx>you can set it to restrict
[02:00]<mrxmjum>loather, block what?
[02:01]<gndyvx>which is what i do on most of my access ports
[02:01]<mrxmjum>restrict = just drop the packet + log it
[02:01]<mrxmjum>protect = drop but no log
[02:01]<mrxmjum>shutdown = shutdown the whole port and pot it in errdisable
[02:02]<mrxmjum>protect is paltform dependent
[02:02]<fjzvxnz>oh, i was right the first time. i thought i remembered reading about dot1x and something about failed auth puts port in errdisable.
[02:02]<gndyvx>there is a lot of errdisable types
[02:03]<fjzvxnz>that's definitely one of those things you'd want a timer to clear, though. if a user mistypes their password you don't want to have to clear the port manually
[02:04]<gndyvx>yeah... errdisable recovery is great
[02:04]<mrxmjum>does this timer apply to all errdisabled ports? such as errdisabled ports by BPDUguard
[02:05]<fjzvxnz>i grabbed a couple gbics from work one day and wanted to play around with them in the 3550. turns out it didn't know what to do with one of them and put the port in errdisable. i had a hell of a time trying to figure out how to clear it the first time
[02:06]<fjzvxnz>the gbic in question turned out to be some fibrechannel thing
[02:06]<mrxmjum>loather, same to me, but i used "shutdown" then "no shutdown" and it went fine out of errdisable state
[02:06]<mrxmjum>"To bring a secure port out of the error-disabled state, enter the errdisable recovery cause violation_mode global configuration command, or you can manually reenable it by entering the shutdown and no shut down interface configuration commands." from cisco.com
[02:08]<mrxmjum>I'm so hangry :/
[02:08]<mrxmjum-rpc>brb
[02:09]<fjzvxnz>yeah, that's how i ended up doing it
[02:19]<xud2jfv>is a 6 E1 multilink with 100ms latency quite normal?
[02:20]<gndyvx>humbolt: depends on the distancy really
[02:20]<sazdn>if its going cross the us, thats fairly decent
[02:20]<gndyvx>exactly
[02:20]<gndyvx>if it is across town, then it should be better
[02:20]<sazdn>60ms is fiber cross country
[02:20]<sazdn>thats what i normally see anyway on our links
[02:21]<fjzvxnz>does the repeating equipment do store/forward?
[02:21]<xud2jfv>assuming we have currently about 8 mbit traffic on that?
[02:21]<sazdn>humbolt whats the distane
[02:21]<sazdn>distance
[02:21]<xud2jfv>Scrye: Caribbean to Miami
[02:21]<gndyvx>http://www.twtelecom.com/cust_solutions/services/ip_network_overview_performance.html <-- our delays
[02:21]<sag>store and forward?
[02:22]<sazdn>100ms aint great
[02:22]<sazdn>could be the router you are terminating on
[02:22]<sazdn>the cpu could be overloaded
[02:22]<xud2jfv>no cpu at 15%
[02:23]<sazdn>the other side
[02:23]<gndyvx>any errors?
[02:24]<sazdn>what is the underlaying medium?
[02:24]<sazdn>are you sure its fiber going to miami
[02:24]<sazdn>100ms sounds somthing wireless to me
[02:24]<gndyvx>get a POS provider
[02:24]<xud2jfv>POS?
[02:24]<sazdn>piece of shite?
[02:25]<xud2jfv>should be fiber as far as I know
[02:25]<sazdn>wouldnt a frac T3/E3 be cheaper than 6 E1s?
[02:25]<xud2jfv>no idea, don't deal with transmission
[02:25]<sazdn>nemith : E3 is like 36 mbit right?
[02:25]<sazdn>i know its less than a T3
[02:26]<fjzvxnz>Scrye: depends on the location really. it may be that all they have available are ds1 circuits to the location
[02:26]<cuvyncjmnz>a frac T3/E3 offers your scallability if you plan on increasing bandwidth
[02:26]<xud2jfv>we have a ds3 as well
[02:27]<cuvyncjmnz>6 x E1's is an absolute waste of cash
[02:27]<sazdn>34.3
[02:27]<xud2jfv>the e1s are for another client, he pays the bills
[02:27]<cuvyncjmnz>Hmmm
[02:27]<xud2jfv>CutieCoder: tell me more!
[02:28]<cuvyncjmnz>Well, if the circuits are off different loops, you can offer redundancy
[02:28]<cuvyncjmnz>humbolt: I'm not gonna do your homeworks
[02:28]<xud2jfv>Maybe I can impress my superior proposing a frac e3/t3
[02:28]<cuvyncjmnz>Get a clue first
[02:28]<znzwzzn>i have two internet connections, connected to a router with two eth interfaces. i would like to have the private lan view it as one interface. Is there something i can do with the loop back?
[02:28]<sazdn>well 6E1's is 12mbit
[02:28]<sazdn>a E3 will be 3x that capacity wise
[02:29]<znzwzzn>view it as one public interface. or one internet connection
[02:29]<cuvyncjmnz>Yeah
[02:29]<znzwzzn>i guess that sounds silly.
[02:29]<xud2jfv>Syrus: for what cost, that's the question and I have not insight on that, yet.
[02:29]<cuvyncjmnz>jerware: not at all
[02:29]<cuvyncjmnz>jerware: 1 circuit == 1 point of failure
[02:29]<sazdn>well they prolly have an E3 already to give you those 6 E1s
[02:29]<fjzvxnz>spof sucks :(
[02:30]<cuvyncjmnz>loather: no shit ;)
[02:30]<znzwzzn>Cuitie: i dont mind that. but i just want to combine both bandwidths
[02:30]<xud2jfv>Scrye: they probably have much more than that
[02:30]<sazdn>an E3 carries 17 E1s
[02:30]<znzwzzn>for the private lan to benfit from both
[02:31]<cuvyncjmnz>jerware: I'd rather have 2 frac T3 circuits than 1 full T3 circuit.
[02:31]<xud2jfv>but at the moment I don't care about what they have
[02:31]<znzwzzn>oh ok
[02:31]<xud2jfv>I am not in the position to influence any of those decisions anyway
[02:31]<cuvyncjmnz>jerware: as long as they sit on different loops... I'm a happy camper
[02:31]<xud2jfv>frac like fraction
[02:32]<znzwzzn>you mea loop back interfaces?
[02:32]<znzwzzn>or routing loops







