IRC Networks
Irc Logs Stats
Start date: 2007-09-27 02:48:27
Last update: 2008-10-24 20:19:38
Channels: 41
Logged Lines: 6230436
Size: 1822.59 MB
Powered by
Channel Info
Network: freenodeChannel: #cisco |
Search in www.irclog.org
Log from #cisco at freenode 2006-05-29
[00:00]<ygpjvnc9ww>beep beep
[00:01]<ygpjvnc9ww>has anyone used http://www.black-market-babies.com/ before?
[00:24]<rvy>lol
[00:24]<rvy>infotek411
[01:39]<mw9>gn #cisco
[01:52]<rvy>anyone recommend a particular practice test CCNA?
[02:38]<cuvyncjmnz>avi: yes, RTFM
[02:38]<cuvyncjmnz>and get some gear
[02:38]<rvy>u mean a router?
[02:39]<cuvyncjmnz>a router (25xx/26xx), a switch (29xx), ISDN simulator board
[02:39]<cuvyncjmnz>errrm, no ISDN simulator board, that's CCNP/CCIE :)
[02:40]<cuvyncjmnz>Spell out your words too
[02:42]<rvy>i have some simulator stuff, the boson software seams to suck pretty bad
[02:42]<rvy>u can't test your virtual network with ping
[02:42]<cuvyncjmnz>boson software is ok
[02:42]<cuvyncjmnz>"U" == You
[02:42]<rvy>ping works partially
[02:43]<cuvyncjmnz>Spell it out you annoying twat
[02:43]<rvy>I love people on freenode :)
[02:44]<rvy>I was building an OSPF network, and configured it all properly on Boson, then realized it wouldn't ping through the router
[02:44]<cucx>anyone here good with QoS on Ciscos ?
[02:44]<cuvyncjmnz>You're touching OSPF?! HAH!
[02:45]<rvy>considering you have to know it for CCNA yes...
[02:45]<cuvyncjmnz>You do? They must've changed that a while ago
[02:45]<rvy>not as much as before, but still many OSPF questions
[02:46]<cuvyncjmnz>avi: OSPF is a beast of its own.... especially for someone who's starting in routing-switching
[02:47]<cuvyncjmnz>avi: are they teaching BGP in the CCNA now?
[02:47]<cucx>CutieCoder do you know some QoS and rate limit details ?
[02:47]<rvy>i think BGP is more of CCNP stuff
[02:47]<cuvyncjmnz>CukX: don't ask to ask, just ask.
[02:48]<cuvyncjmnz>avi: from my professional point of view, so is OSPF
[02:48]<rvy>in the Cisco Press book there is a large section about single area OSPF
[02:48]<rvy>for CCNA
[02:49]<cuvyncjmnz>Omg...
[02:49]<cuvyncjmnz>this is not good
[02:49]<rvy>not much if anything in the 2 CCNA books about BGP
[02:49]<cucx>CutieCoder I'd like to traffic shape one certain BGP community on C3550
[02:49]<rvy>cisco press that is
[02:49]<2zrgvj>they (CIsco) need to STOP teaching classfulness, and maybe go into how TCP actually works
[02:49]<cuvyncjmnz>CukX: where are you stuck?
[02:50]<cucx>CutieCoder shaping works great, but only as access-lists, I have stuck, how to "insert" all 140prefixes from BGP community onto it
[02:50]<rvy>they teach CIDR also
[02:50]<2zrgvj>I know, but they shouldn't even bother with classfulness
[02:51]<cucx>avi true... lot's of CIDR, lots of calculating subnets, ...
[02:51]<rvy>i agree, i have to memorize the class ranges again bc i forget them
[02:51]<cuvyncjmnz>branto: yes they should, a lot of networks are still running class based routing
[02:52]<cuvyncjmnz>CukX: Hmmm, there's many ways to do that... let me figure out the less butt fugly
[02:52]<2zrgvj>I disagree. Classfulness should be a footnote. no one is deploying a network on RIPv1 or IGRP anymore
[02:53]<cucx>CutieCoder don't forget, it's 3550, not 6509 :)
[02:53]<cuvyncjmnz>CukX: Qutie aware ;)
[02:54]<cuvyncjmnz>CukX: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800c75d4.html
[02:54]<cuvyncjmnz>bang ;)|
[02:54]<cuvyncjmnz>RTFM f00
[02:54]<cuvyncjmnz>first hit on google
[02:55]<cuvyncjmnz>CukX: this also will help you out throughout your infrastructure
[02:55]<sfnnlnz__>anyone know why ethernet went from bus topology with all the coaxial stuff to a switch based approach?
[02:55]<sfnnlnz__>why didn't they just start with the switch based
[02:56]<cuvyncjmnz>sleeper, why didn't they start making steam boats before diesel powered boats?
[02:57]<cuvyncjmnz>Ohh wait, they did :P
[02:57]<sfnnlsvnz>:)
[02:57]<cuvyncjmnz>god I'm ass backward today
[02:57]<sfnnlsvnz>well i am just thinking i mean was it that they didn't know?
[02:57]<cucx>CutieCoder but, hm... as i understand it, I need to do on my uplink too ? I have only my 3550, wich should do QoS on uplink port and access ports ( inputs )
[02:57]<cuvyncjmnz>QoS on one side makes no sense
[02:58]<cuvyncjmnz>CukX: not only you should do rate-limiting, the PE also should do rate-limiting
[02:58]<cucx>CutieCoder but I don't have access to it
[02:58]<cuvyncjmnz>that's called ask your provider
[02:59]<cucx>CutieCoder haha... ok, but anyway...no other options ?
[02:59]<cuvyncjmnz>CukX: well, your option is in that page, since it tells you how to match a community and assign a precedence to it
[03:00]<cuvyncjmnz>then you filter out the CoS value set and it goes in the queue
[03:06]<dzzc1lyvn>hey
[03:06]<dzzc1lyvn>really neat
[03:06]<dzzc1lyvn>http://members.cox.net/crandall11/money/spider/
[03:08]<dzzc1lyvn>bbl
[03:08]<cucx>CutieCoder But you think, that that works on 3550 for sure ?
[03:14]<cuvyncjmnz>CukX: Yes, are you dumb?! you got BGP and QoS support in your image, yes it'll work
[03:16]<cuvyncjmnz>FBH^: ok ok
[03:16]<cuvyncjmnz>FBH^: I'm just trigger happy today... as usual ;)
[03:21]<afsc>italy is the shitness
[03:21]<cuvyncjmnz>easy on the enter key there :P
[03:21]<afsc>not as easy as germany
[03:21]<afsc>but easy
[03:22]<cuvyncjmnz>HAHA!
[03:23]<cuvyncjmnz>I am on speed :P
[03:23]<cuvyncjmnz>well, a modified version of it
[03:23]<afsc>I wish I was on speed
[03:23]<afsc>she? is?
[03:23]<afsc>I assume she
[03:24]<cuvyncjmnz>3,4-bromo-2-methylene-5-benzoyl-methamphetamine ;)
[03:24]<cuvyncjmnz>Bang
[03:24]<afsc>I don't know her name
[03:24]<afsc>ah I see now
[03:24]<afsc>Sarah
[03:24]<cuvyncjmnz>:)
[03:24]<afsc>ok I hope she then







