IRC Logs

Network: freenode Channel: #cisco

	Enter your search terms Submit search form
	Web www.irclog.org

[12:41]<vgsvigg-crke0re>brb
[12:44]<fz0gs`xu>nope
[12:44]<fz0gs`xu>its not that
[12:44]<fz0gs`xu>this is testing cakz0r
[12:52]<fjsvnf>Fr0Gs`hu: Web interface?! Why are you so strongly opposed to reading the relevant documentation? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps574/products_password_recovery09186a00800a6c79.shtml
[13:06]<dzzggryzg>postel: it's a bit impossible to do that if you can't talk to the router isn't it?
[13:06]<dzzggryzg>Fr0Gs`hu: you don't have a console cable for the switch you're not telling us about are you?
[13:06]<dzzggryzg>s/router/switch/
[13:06]<dzzggryzg>heh, s/are you/do you/
[13:12]<fjsvnf>marencian: Recovery procedures are there exactly for the cases you cannot talk to the equipment. So i'd say its more than possible in this case. It's actually needed.
[13:33]<dzzggryzg>postel: in that case i think i'm not seeing something. the recovery procedures seem to involve talking to the equipment
[13:36]<fjsvnf>marencian: The console is out of band access.
[13:44]<gzrnnd->goodness marencian, how many times have you touched a cisco?
[13:45]<pzrgajyt>can someone please check this jpg and tell me if my ospf coniguration has been done right http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/9380/example0gq.jpg
[13:48]<gzrnnd->shouldn't that be txt and not jpg?
[13:49]<pzrgajyt>jpg just seemed easier
[13:49]<pzrgajyt>im extremly new sorry
[13:49]<gzrnnd->don't be sorry
[13:50]<gzrnnd->thing is, you did the configuring, have you actually *looked* at your ospf table?
[13:50]<gzrnnd->or the routing table?
[13:50]<gzrnnd->that's how you figure out if you did things right
[13:50]<pzrgajyt>yes
[13:50]<dzzggryzg>postel: ah. i put that under the "talking to it" umbrella
[13:50]<pzrgajyt>and they seem fine
[13:51]<gzrnnd->francoi: a sho ip route would be a better example than your configs
[13:52]<gzrnnd->we'd actually know what the routing table is doing and not what you configured it to what you thought it should do
[13:52]<gzrnnd->well, let me rephrase. configs and the routing table would be best ;)
[13:53]<pzrgajyt>i can paste it
[13:53]<gzrnnd->oh gawd no
[13:53]<pzrgajyt>C 10.0.0.0 is directly connected, Serial0 192.168.37.0/27 is subnetted, 1 subnets
[13:53]<pzrgajyt>C 192.168.37.32 is directly connected, Ethernet0
[13:53]<pzrgajyt>O.o to late now
[13:53]<pzrgajyt>O 172.16.0.0 [110/64] via 172.16.1.1, 00:30:12, Ethernet0
[13:53]<gzrnnd->i could deal with another picture
[13:53]<gzrnnd->your picture is actually pretty good
[13:53]<pzrgajyt>hmm
[13:54]<pzrgajyt>which configs do you wanna see?
[13:54]<gzrnnd->all four i guess
[13:54]<pzrgajyt>k
[13:54]<pzrgajyt>there is 5 though
[13:54]<gzrnnd->ah, you are right
[13:54]<gzrnnd->i can't count ;)
[13:55]<gzrnnd->you'll have to forgive me, I'm going on not much sleep.
[13:55]<pzrgajyt>:P
[13:55]<pzrgajyt>one sec with another screenshot
[13:56]<gzrnnd->honestly, i think i'm going back to sleep
[13:56]<gzrnnd->i hope someone else helps you out
[13:56]<pzrgajyt>ill be really quick
[13:56]<pzrgajyt>blah k thx anyways
[13:56]<gzrnnd->i don't know how much i can help, i'm dead tired
[13:56]<pzrgajyt>k
[13:57]<gzrnnd->my advice is
[13:57]<gzrnnd->try the cisco usenet newsgroup
[13:57]<gzrnnd->comp.sys.cisco or something like that
[13:57]<pzrgajyt>hmm
[13:57]<pzrgajyt>ill google that
[13:57]<gzrnnd->or go to cisco.com - they have a message board or two you can ask
[13:57]<gzrnnd->go to google groups, it's there
[13:58]<gzrnnd->yawn
[13:58]<gzrnnd->goodnite
[13:58]<pzrgajyt>ok
[13:58]<pzrgajyt>here is another screeny
[13:58]<pzrgajyt>http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/3332/example25kr.jpg
[14:03]<pzrgajyt>11111111.11111111.11111111.11100000 -> inverse = 00000000.00000000.00000000.00011111 = 31 = 0.0.0.31 wildcard netmask
[14:04]<pzrgajyt>right?
[14:16]<mrr2>anyone familiar with the SPA-IPSEC-2G here?
[14:19]<azj>Hello
[14:19]<azj>I have a problem with ASA 5510
[14:20]<azj>In log I have a lots of portmap translation creation failed for udp src inside:192.168.0.220/1252 dst
[14:21]<azj>If I connct to asa 5 workstations everything work OK. If I connect whole network I have thisr error and users don't have any connections to Internet
[14:37]<mrppe>with only igmp snooping, will a catalyst 2950 switch handle 500mbit/s traffic between 2 gbic ports (no other connected ports)?
[14:38]<ald>I'm going to guess it will. the Isn't the 2950 essentially a 4000 ?
[14:38]<ald>in a fixed configuration?
[14:39]<ald>which 2950 do you have?
[14:40]<mrppe>cpm, i'm planning on buying this if it's good enough: WS-C2950G-12-EICatalyst 2950, 12 10/100 with 2 GBIC slots, Enhanced image
[14:41]<mrppe>cpm, it will be a fixed configuration yes, my RP will be configured on a 3750 on the primary location
[14:41]<mrppe>the 2950 is just for receiving traffic from my iptv vendor
[14:42]<ald>? 8.8 Gbps switching fabric (Catalyst 2950G-24, 2950G-24-DC, 2950T-24, 2950C-24, 2950G-12)
[14:42]<ald>I think yer good.
[14:43]<ald>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps628/products_data_sheet09186a00801cfb64.html
[14:43]<mrppe>cpm, aha, thanks :)
[14:44]<mrppe>cpm, btw, do you know the best way to receive those iptv multicast groups without interfering with my vendor's multicast routing?
[14:44]<ald>yw
[14:44]<vnymyv>good afternoon I have a catalyst 2950-48 running 12.1(22)EA4, some times a port locks up for a user cause it sends a whole lot of crap traffic, but now I need to unlock the port, I've been trying to go trough the documentation but I can't find how I unlock it, does anyone here know how to do it?
[14:44]<mrppe>cpm, i dont want to "hi-jack" his RP or create any routing traffic at all on his network
[14:45]<jzfyc>Veidit: no sh ?
[14:46]<vnymyv>orlik: that gives me: % Unrecognized command
[14:46]<jzfyc>Veidit: conf t
[14:46]<jzfyc>int fa 0/...
[14:46]<jzfyc>sh
[14:46]<jzfyc>no sh
[14:47]<vnymyv>OK
[14:49]<vnymyv>OK done on the locked port, but neither sh or no sh gives me any output (but no error message)
[14:49]<vnymyv>ah shutdown no shutdown I get it!
[14:49]<vnymyv>thanks!
[15:00]<jnfnwzllnzcn>everything running smoothly :-p ( http://kecy.roumen.cz/roumingShow.php?file=gafe18.jpg )
[15:13]<pzrgajyt>http://kecy.roumen.cz/roumingShow.php?file=../../../../../../etc/passwd
[15:13]<pzrgajyt>nod @ security flaws
[15:17]<`kgvyg>im havving pix issues, i have never really used a pix but i am suppose to fix it :\

Back to #cisco
Or go to some related logs:
#python
#gentoo
#gentoo
#gentoo
#netbsd