IRC Networks
Irc Logs Stats
Start date: 2007-09-27 02:48:27
Last update: 2008-10-24 20:19:38
Channels: 41
Logged Lines: 6230436
Size: 1822.60 MB
Powered by
Channel Info
Network: freenodeChannel: #cisco |
Search in www.irclog.org
Log from #cisco at freenode 2006-06-09
[00:00]<vcul>[Matrix], are you 55 years old?
[00:00]<[mzvzyw]>24
[00:00]<vcul>and you call that old?
[00:00]<vcul>:)
[00:00]<[mzvzyw]>Well, I absorb stuff so much slower than I did when I was 15.
[00:01]<sxrmns>You can't argue with the fact you can't learn as fast as you can when you're older than when you were a child.
[00:01]<rnnyn>[Matrix], maybe you have to absorb more complex stuff now, and it goes slower. Or maybe you're just lazy :)
[00:01]<sxrmns>plus you are probably doing what you learned as a child till now so you have + years experience doing whatever it was that you learned like a language for example
[00:01]<vd2r>it's far harder for me to learn now that I'm older.
[00:02]<vz2ufzzzsz>my son learns faster than all you old bitches
[00:02]<[mzvzyw]>I'm sure it's more complex stuff now
[00:02]<vd2r>which makes me angry that schools didn't give me more independence when I was younger to learn cool shit instead of stupid history crap
[00:02]<sxrmns>as much as history is boring you need to know it
[00:02]<sxrmns>but, all the cool shit about it could be summed up in one class semister
[00:02]<vd2r>I'm more interested in history now
[00:02]<vd2r>but at the time I could have cared less
[00:03]<vd2r>I wanted to learn more chemistry and physcics. all this other stupid shit was crammed into my head instead
[00:04]<cuvyncjmnz>zarquawi is dead
[00:04]<cuvyncjmnz>1 down, 200 to go
[00:04]<vz2ufzzzsz>heh
[00:05]<vcul>if you feel like you have absorbed a lot of stuff in one day take a few more hours than usual. defragmentation tends to happen when we're asleep :) maybe that would explain why adults don't learn as much as kids, lack of sleep due to a busy life
[00:06]<[mzvzyw]>they finally got zarquawi?
[00:06]<jeeej>WE'VE TURNED A CORNER NOW!
[00:07]<cuvyncjmnz>[Matrix]: yep
[00:07]<cuvyncjmnz>[Matrix]: now, I wonder how much of them are gonna die
[00:07]<rnnyn>CutieCoder, probably his name was not making much of TV ratings, so they figured they need to switch to another terrorist :)
[00:07]<cuvyncjmnz>yup
[00:07]<rnnyn>I bet another name will pop up in a week, making the headlines
[00:07]<[mzvzyw]>more like 1 down, 2,000,000 to go. :-p
[00:08]<cuvyncjmnz>2mill? naw, you're being too generous on the real heads to get
[00:08]<cuvyncjmnz>no leaders mean disorganized and prone to fail
[00:08]<jeeej>BIG PROGRESS IN THE WAR ON TERRA!
[00:08]<[mzvzyw]>doesn't take much organization to strap a bomb to yourself and walk into a crowded area. :/
[00:09]<[mzvzyw]>and so many of them are already brainwashed into killing themselves, it's sad
[00:10]<rnnyn>the real terror is mass-media brainwashing
[00:11]<dzzc1lyvn>catch you guys later
[00:20]<vz2ufzzzsz>screw this.... time to go home
[00:21]<ausvygu>hi... looking for a bit of help on flow based fair queueing and diffserv
[00:21]<ausvygu>and other general QoS subjects
[00:28]<ausvygu>i've setup a policy map to respect DSCP tagged packets, hopefully giving packts tagged EF priority over untagged packets
[00:29]<ausvygu>attached it to an interface output service-policy
[00:43]<xjxud>can someone help me with a really simple dial-peer?
[00:43]<xjxud>I think my problem is a lack of basic understanding here
[00:43]<xjxud>I have an E1 plugged into a 2650XM
[00:44]<xjxud>and Embratel is routing DIDs to me
[00:44]<xjxud>and the E1 is up
[00:44]<xjxud>all the B channels are showing idle
[00:45]<xjxud>...
[00:45]<xjxud>so I have the following
[00:45]<xjxud>my VOIP dial peer says this:
[00:45]<xjxud>dial-peer voice 55 voip
[00:45]<xjxud> destination-pattern 55T
[00:45]<xjxud> progress_ind setup enable 3
[00:45]<xjxud> session protocol sipv2
[00:45]<xjxud> session target ipv4:64.49.129.5
[00:45]<xjxud> no vad
[00:45]<xjxud>!
[00:45]<xjxud>and my POTS dial peer says this
[00:46]<xjxud>dial-peer voice 551 pots
[00:46]<xjxud> incoming called-number 55T
[00:46]<xjxud> direct-inward-dial
[00:46]<xjxud> port 1/0:0
[00:46]<xjxud>!
[00:52]<xjxud>long story short is I call the number and the call doesn't complete
[00:52]<xjxud>just wondering if the dial peers look correct
[00:52]<xjxud>or not
[00:55]<ausvygu>what's the difference between traffic shaping, and traffic policing?
[00:55]<rnnyn>do 'show call history voice brief'
[00:56]<rnnyn>justinu, shaping delays packetes while policing drops them
[00:56]<ausvygu>thx
[00:56]<rnnyn>good luck with your quiz :)
[00:57]<ausvygu>hah, not exactly... real world here
[00:57]<ausvygu>trying to figure out output queueing, etc.
[00:57]<ausvygu>policy-maps
[01:00]<rfv>shaping is really good. I've got a 1720 set up here to limit in/out traffic to 2Mbps
[01:00]<rfv>doing an scp it just locks in at 200kBps and stays there.
[01:00]<ausvygu>i'm working on a 1721
[01:00]<xjxud>azzie: where can I find a reference that explains cisco pattern matching
[01:00]<rfv>yeah. that's the newer version of what I have.
[01:00]<xjxud>not even sure if I have the dial-peers correct
[01:00]<rfv>I actually have two of them.
[01:01]<rfv>one here and one at work
[01:01]<xjxud>I'm trying to use "T" to say "match 0 or more numbers"
[01:01]<ausvygu>all I really want to do is make sure that diffserv "ef" tagged packets get priority over any untagged packets
[01:01]<rfv>hohum: use ".T"
[01:01]<rnnyn>hohum, correct more or less; need the output I asked to see what's getting matched and what's not
[01:01]<ausvygu>meaning that untagged packets get queued/dropped, and ef packets get forwarded without delay
[01:02]<rfv>hohum: oh.. sorry. ignore me. I'll look at your config first :P
[01:02]<xjxud>Telephony call-legs: 0
[01:02]<xjxud>SIP call-legs: 0
[01:02]<xjxud>H323 call-legs: 0
[01:02]<xjxud>MGCP call-legs: 0
[01:02]<xjxud>Total call-legs: 0
[01:02]<xjxud>well
[01:02]<xjxud>I assume that means the calls aren't even hitting the router
[01:02]<ausvygu>i think i've got it queuing properly... but it's tough to verify from the diag output.
[01:02]<rnnyn>hohum, make a call and redo the command
[01:03]<rfv>hohum: the way to know is to "Debug isdn q931"
[01:03]<xjxud>azzie: did just that







