IRC Networks
Irc Logs Stats
Start date: 2007-09-27 02:48:27
Last update: 2008-10-24 20:19:38
Channels: 41
Logged Lines: 6230436
Size: 1822.19 MB
Powered by
Channel Info
Network: freenodeChannel: #csharp |
Search in www.irclog.org
Log from #csharp at freenode 2006-06-14
[13:46]<kjr>+Kiryn: I might take you up on the offer, assuming you want to toss me a login and promise not to fuck with things
[13:46]<kjr>+obviously if there are issues, the DNS will be pointed elsewhere
[13:46]<kdzdg>+oh i won't unless you tell me
[13:46]<kjr>+in the meantime... someone write a damn bot ;)
[13:46]<kdzdg>+i don't fuck with other peoples shit
[13:46]<kjr>+or beat smellyhippy till he produces one
[13:46]<y-gz>-who is gonna host the bot ?
[13:47]<kjr>+any number of people
[13:47]<kdzdg>+whats the bot going to be written in?
[13:47]<kjr>+we'll worry about that if anyone actually fucking writes one
[13:47]<kjr>+Kiryn: take a guess
[13:47]<y-gz>-use eggdrop and some factoits script ?
[13:47]<kdzdg>+oh :P
[13:47]<y-gz>-why reinvent the wheel yet one more time
[13:47]<kjr>+because it'd be uncool to have a bot for a C# channel in C/TCL...
[13:48]<kdzdg>+kinda defies the point of a C# channel
[13:48]<y-gz>-we won't tell anywone
[13:48]<y-gz>-:)
[13:48]<kjr>+I suppose I could grab a copy of JavaBot
[13:48]<kjr>+migrate it through J#
[13:48]<kjr>+then migrate that to C#
[13:48]<y-gz>-possibly
[13:48]<mrryffr>+anyone know a good tutorial for using MCI?
[13:49]<y-gz>-but not sleep sleep sleep :)
[13:49]<kdzdg>+brb
[13:49]<y-gz>-s/not/now
[13:50]<mrryffr>+echo `cd ~ && cat fridge >> /dev/stomach && make clean && mount /dev/head /mnt/pillow && wall -n goodnight! && sleep 28800` >> i-nZ
[13:51]<kdzdg>+haha
[13:51]<kjr>+original...
[13:52]<kjr>+told ;)
[13:52]<kjr>+ACTION wanders off
[14:02]<y-gz>-Kog was supposed to sleep no tme :P
[14:02]<y-gz>-*not me
[14:03]<y-gz>-darn my typing sux today
[14:04]<kdzdg>+mine always sucks
[14:04]<jaz`>+sfdf sfsfs
[14:04]<jaz`>+;)
[14:04]<zgzzcydjvgev>+hmm
[14:04]<y-gz>-dunno but I like sucking coffee
[14:04]<y-gz>-lol
[14:05]<zgzzcydjvgev>+is it csc.exe that generates the xml documentation files?
[14:05]<kdzdg>+you do a good job of it ;)
[14:05]<y-gz>-csc /help ?
[14:05]<zgzzcydjvgev>+er
[14:05]<y-gz>-dor mono it is
[14:05]<zgzzcydjvgev>+i'm trying to figure out how i could modify whatever it is that generates the xml doc files
[14:05]<y-gz>-mcs -doc:filename
[14:06]<wyfaj>-AnarkiDotNET: yes
[14:06]<zgzzcydjvgev>+is csc a .NET application or a native code app?
[14:06]<wyfaj>-native
[14:06]<y-gz>-wilco: really ?
[14:06]<zgzzcydjvgev>+fuck!
[14:06]<wyfaj>-i-nZ: really
[14:06]<zgzzcydjvgev>+thats lame
[14:07]<wyfaj>-AnarkiDotNET: open-source though ;)
[14:07]<y-gz>-open souce ?!
[14:07]<zgzzcydjvgev>+the VS2k5 generated XML doc files suck ass
[14:07]<wyfaj>-Rotor....
[14:07]<dzrrjgd>+how can i get the battery status with c#?
[14:07]<y-gz>-that's not OPEN
[14:07]<y-gz>-that's "Can't touch this" source
[14:07]<zgzzcydjvgev>+shared source*
[14:08]<wyfaj>-fine
[14:08]<wyfaj>-i-nZ: cant touch this source? huh?
[14:08]<y-gz>-are you allowed to make derivative work ?
[14:08]<y-gz>-non-commercial derivative work
[14:09]<wyfaj>-I believe so.
[14:09]<wyfaj>-it's mostly for academic purposes
[14:09]<wyfaj>-anyway, read the license to figure out the real facts
[14:09]<txnjzd>+if you want a c# compiler written in c# see mcsss
[14:10]<zgzzcydjvgev>+i dont
[14:10]<zgzzcydjvgev>+<AnarkiDotNET> i'm trying to figure out how i could modify whatever it is that generates the xml doc files
[14:10]<zgzzcydjvgev>+<AnarkiDotNET> the VS2k5 generated XML doc files suck ass
[14:10]<txnjzd>+AnarkiDotNET: what do you dislike about them?
[14:10]<zgzzcydjvgev>+....
[14:10]<zgzzcydjvgev>+they are totally fucking worthless
[14:11]<zgzzcydjvgev>+they dont even differentiate between a class, an enum, or a struct
[14:11]<zgzzcydjvgev>+for one
[14:11]<zgzzcydjvgev>+also, they arent well formed XML
[14:12]<wyfaj>-they do, just in a not optimal way.
[14:12]<zgzzcydjvgev>+<member name="T:MU.ITransmissible.TransmissionLength"><stuff /></member>
[14:12]<wyfaj>-how aren't they well formed?
[14:12]<zgzzcydjvgev>+thats not well formed
[14:12]<wyfaj>-yeah, so?
[14:12]<wyfaj>-why not?
[14:12]<zgzzcydjvgev>+well formed would be:
[14:13]<zgzzcydjvgev>+<member><name>ITransmissible</name><type>interface</type><namespace>MU</namespace></member>
[14:13]<zgzzcydjvgev>+just as a quick example
[14:13]<wyfaj>-heh
[14:13]<wyfaj>-you're confusing conveniently formed with well formed.
[14:14]<zgzzcydjvgev>+<wilco> they do, just in a not optimal way. <--no they dont
[14:14]<zgzzcydjvgev>+<AnarkiDotNET> they dont even differentiate between a class, an enum, or a struct <--theres no difference in the name attribute
[14:14]<wyfaj>-oh, i misread that. Right, they're all types
[14:14]<zgzzcydjvgev>+which means its worthless
[14:14]<wyfaj>-you'll have to use reflection to get out that stuff
[14:15]<zgzzcydjvgev>+unless you are only doing like, simple statistical analysis
[14:15]<wyfaj>-anyway, I agree they're not optimal at all, but its fairly easy to get things done still
[14:15]<zgzzcydjvgev>+but comments arent compiled into the binaries
[14:15]<wyfaj>-which makes sense
[14:15]<zgzzcydjvgev>+unless theres a switch to do that?







