IRC Logs

Network: freenode Channel: #csharp

	Enter your search terms Submit search form
	Web www.irclog.org

[04:39]<rxrcr>.Name?
[04:40]<22vnax><tagname value1="asdf" value?="aaa" />
[04:40]<22vnax>I want the whole thing
[04:41]<22vnax>and I don't know what attributes will be inside the element
[04:47]<22vnax>found it!
[04:47]<22vnax>System.Xml.XmlDocument.ReadNode(reader)
[04:49]<22vnax>reader.Node would have been more obvious!
[05:28]<[baf79]>Hi
[05:29]<[baf79]>does anybody know of any good, freeware WYSIWYG html editor components for C# applications?
[08:32]<fyfuym-syfggag>[BAF64] check hotscripts.com
[08:32]<afd>later, lunch time!
[08:45]<fyfuym-syfggag>sup AqD!
[09:03]<myryvrfljjl>is .net framework 2.0 pretty much bundling with vista?
[09:03]<myryvrfljjl>we can almost start writing .net desktop apps! :-)
[09:03]<zgzzcygnv>...
[09:04]<zgzzcygnv>uh, whats been keeping us from doing that for the last, oh, i dunno... 6 years?
[09:04]<myryvrfljjl>AnarkiNet: oh
[09:04]<myryvrfljjl>AnarkiNet: what have you written?
[09:10]<fyfuym-syfggag>AnarkiNet LOL!
[09:12]<myryvrfljjl>i thought WCF and WPF are part of .net 3
[09:13]<myryvrfljjl>why doesn't MSFT just bundle that
[09:13]<myryvrfljjl>with vista
[09:13]<zgzzcygnv><digitalpoop> we can almost start writing .net desktop apps! :-) <--desktop apps have been around since, erm... windows 3.1, lol
[09:13]<myryvrfljjl>if you bundle .net 2 by default you can only write simple windows forms
[09:13]<zgzzcygnv>simple?
[09:13]<zgzzcygnv>are you fucking retarded?
[09:13]<myryvrfljjl>simple == non WPF
[09:14]<cjmgrug>EASY BOY..
[09:14]<myryvrfljjl>wtf?
[09:14]<cjmgrug>oops.. easy oy*
[09:14]<myryvrfljjl>pretty hostile eh
[09:14]<cjmgrug>easy boy* :p
[09:15]<myryvrfljjl>is this AnarkiNet the house troll?
[09:15]<zgzzcygnv>no, i just fail to see how Windows Forms in .NET 2.0 is "simple"
[09:16]<nnzjpfrr>well, you could try MFC for a change...
[09:16]<cjmgrug>yuck.
[09:17]<nnzjpfrr>you will come back crying and swearing and will beg us to give you .NET 2.0 windows forms...
[09:17]<zgzzcygnv>zeroflag talking to me?
[09:17]<nnzjpfrr>who else is complaining about .NET 2.0 windows forms? oO
[09:18]<myryvrfljjl>no one was
[09:18]<zgzzcygnv>erm, digitalpoop was
[09:18]<myryvrfljjl>but someone got their panties in a bunch
[09:18]<myryvrfljjl><AnarkiNet> are you fucking retarded?
[09:18]<myryvrfljjl>for no fucking reason
[09:18]<zgzzcygnv>you still need to get back to me on that one
[09:18]<zgzzcygnv><digitalpoop> if you bundle .net 2 by default you can only write simple windows forms
[09:18]<myryvrfljjl>right, if i fucking live on irc maybe i would
[09:19]<zgzzcygnv>if you had ANY software programming experience you would know the windows forms in .NET 2.0 are far from both simple and simply-featured
[09:19]<cjmgrug>Macke!
[09:20]<mracn>Mornin'!
[09:20]<mracn>What's up?
[09:20]<myryvrfljjl>is there a simple table on MSDN that lists which .net framework is bundled?
[09:20]<cjmgrug>same old things.. what are you upto?
[09:20]<myryvrfljjl>with which OS?
[09:21]<mracn>just checking email and stuff before work
[09:21]<mracn>digitalpoop: Not afaik
[09:21]<cjmgrug>k
[09:21]<myryvrfljjl>it might be kinda useful
[09:21]<myryvrfljjl>i think bundling started in xp
[09:21]<myryvrfljjl>or maybe not
[09:21]<mracn>digitalpoop: Actually, iirc, .NET is only bundled with Vista
[09:21]<zgzzcygnv>no
[09:22]<mracn>I think .NET might be bundled with some service packs, but that's a different story
[09:22]<zgzzcygnv>my winxp pro SP2 disk has 1.1
[09:22]<cjmgrug>it was bundled with XP and mediacenter , afaik.. the v 1.1
[09:22]<mracn>ah yes, mediacenter
[09:22]<mracn>forgot about that edition
[09:23]<mracn>is there actually anything different in xp media center, other than the media center app?
[09:23]<mracn>and that media center skin
[09:23]<myryvrfljjl>sorta complicated
[09:23]<cjmgrug>i dont know.. i've always wondered
[09:23]<myryvrfljjl>but okay
[09:23]<cjmgrug>is it a way to fool the idiots? :p
[09:23]<myryvrfljjl>heh
[09:24]<myryvrfljjl>why the massive marketing effort to sell different editions of xp? it doesn't seem like msft has genuinely streamline the user experience per edition
[09:24]<myryvrfljjl>the only thing real is windows server and windows xp
[09:25]<myryvrfljjl>you can tell the two ed. apart
[09:25]<lcs>actualy, xp is the server without server features
[09:25]<mracn>http://www.metacafe.com/watch/136848/hot_chicks/
[09:25]<mracn>sorry for OT, but god damn that's funny
[09:27]<myryvrfljjl>pkg: how you mean by that?
[09:28]<myryvrfljjl>i am just talking about the GUI additions MSFT added in the server edition
[09:28]<myryvrfljjl>i am not saying the kernel's different or the OS env is different
[09:29]<lcs>i dont think that the kernel is any different
[09:29]<lcs>anyway, most windows system look alike and work alike
[09:31]<lcs>the system that might bring something new (new does not imply better) is vista
[09:32]<lcs>but i think, thta they will strip everything from it, so that they can earn more on windows server 2007
[09:32]<lcs>;-)
[09:38]<zgzzcygnv>LOL Macke
[09:38]<zgzzcygnv>that was good :P
[09:43]<lcs>omg
[09:43]<lcs>may i paste something about vista?
[09:44]<svlnvnz>hi all

Back to #csharp
Or go to some related logs:
#gentoo
#gentoo
#gentoo
#php
#blender