IRC Logs

Network: freenode Channel: #php

	Enter your search terms Submit search form
	Web www.irclog.org

[11:34]<whjr_09>hmmm
[11:35]<whjr_09>i hate browser compatibility problems
[11:37]<vrrrjvrrrj>Hi, is it possible for a class to span several files?
[11:41]<czlvzyrmjzrzr>folks, mysql isn't very active.. do you know if it's possible or how could I do something like WHERE id_art=%s, AND WHERE id_top=%d' ?
[11:42]<czlvzyrmjzrzr>getting errors. and I don't think two WHERE 's are correct
[11:42]<ffrggnf>only one where
[11:42]<ffrggnf>WHERE [yadda] AND [yadda]
[11:42]<czlvzyrmjzrzr>ah..
[11:42]<ffrggnf>and no comma
[11:43]<czlvzyrmjzrzr>thanks Flannel
[11:44]<whjr_09>hows my site looking ... lanceit.com
[11:44]<whjr_09>i htink its best viewed in 1200 +
[11:46]<cxjls`>WHoa_04 - you answered that yourself
[11:47]<cxjls`>dont make sites that only a very small proportion of the population can view optimally :p
[11:52]<dzvnaxrud>why does this script alway change the directory to /$cd and not just ./cd
[11:52]<dzvnaxrud>http://rafb.net/paste/results/jC124y84.html
[11:53]<svjgy>hello does anybody tryed to implement a search engine for a website? (not boolean search)
[11:55]<zwgyg>stoni: you mean content search?
[11:55]<svjgy>yes
[11:55]<dzvnaxrud>stoni: www.google.com.ay
[11:55]<svjgy>but I want some king of simple ranking by relevance
[11:55]<dzvnaxrud>www.google.com.au sorry
[11:56]<svjgy>but google cannot spider the content of my databases
[11:56]<zwgyg>stoni: look into tagging / custom keywords in combination with simple ft search over your records ...
[11:56]<svjgy>yes...
[11:56]<svjgy>but i would like to know about any previous experience
[11:56]<czzznzz>hi
[11:56]<svjgy>to do it better
[11:57]<zwgyg>hmm, it depends on your data / users ...
[11:57]<dzvnaxrud>www.google.com.au/search?q=%22site+content+search%22
[11:57]<czzznzz>has anyone installed the WR TimeTracker?
[11:57]<svjgy>like 500 new articles every day, so many
[11:57]<zwgyg>i did a huge document database and the users are fine with just a very basic fulltext search (only weighted by hitcount)
[11:58]<zwgyg>this is possible, because the typical searchterms allow for rather distinct results already (medical stuff ..)
[11:58]<svjgy>do you use an inverted ndex?
[11:59]<svjgy>my problem is that i don't know how to store the order of the words into the article to the inverted index
[12:01]<dzvnaxrud>why does this script always change the directory to /$cd and not just ./$cd http://rafb.net/paste/results/jC124y84.html
[12:02]<svjgy>rwein: how dows your search engine work? all i have found are people using a LIKE query...
[12:02]<crlsj>How'd I get the binary of an image (jpeg, png, etc.)?
[12:03]<zwgyg>stoni: sry was on the phone; i use the fulltext query functions of mysql - was only a prototype but as the client was perfectly happy with the results we never bothered to advance ;)
[12:03]<whjr_09>Chops`: works ok in 800 600 also
[12:04]<jvyajg7>If I use the post method on a form, with the action variable being a php doc with a get variable (such as action="next.php?i=2"), will this work?
[12:05]<jvyajg7>And allow me to access both get and post vars?
[12:05]<jvyajg7>I know I can just try it.. but in the middle of a big code revamp
[12:05]<dzvnaxrud>oticon6 : why just not use 2 posts?
[12:06]<mzzcl>oticon6: That will work, you could also use $_REQUEST which wil hold them all
[12:06]<jvyajg7>Ok thanks
[12:07]<whjr_09>how many users still use 800 600 ?
[12:07]<jvyajg7>mrtechguy: This needs to start as a get because it's called by a header('Location:') in the previous doc, and it's no easier turning it into a post var
[12:08]<mzzcl>WHoa_04: Not as many as use 1024x768 now
[12:08]<jvyajg7>DOesn't matter, if this will work then great
[12:08]<dzvnaxrud>oticon6: just make what you want in the get as hidden form fields :)
[12:09]<whjr_09>MarkL: my site doesst look all to good in 800 600
[12:10]<mzzcl>WHoa_04: Not many do
[12:10]<whjr_09>and theres really not much i can do about it
[12:10]<whjr_09>everything is soo big
[12:12]<whjr_09>i dunno what to do
[12:14]<mzzcl>You only have 2 choices, make the site fit 800x600 or don't ;)
[12:15]<whjr_09>how much percent of users use 800 600 now
[12:16]<fzywjg>That is not known.
[12:16]<whjr_09>i mean is it less then 30
[12:16]<fzywjg><Frixon> That is not known.
[12:16]<jvyajg7>Surely it would be by now
[12:17]<jvyajg7>You can get 17" CRTs dirt cheap
[12:17]<ffrggnf>big screens != high resolution
[12:17]<ffrggnf>a lot of crazy people seem to enjoy having icons be a few inches high.
[12:17]<jvyajg7>*shudders*
[12:17]<jvyajg7>Yeah I suppose
[12:18]<fzywjg>WHoa_04: Just write you website in semantic HTML, layout and design it with CSS and you're set up. If you don't have to rely on fixed width header logos and stuff like that, your website will suit for every resolution.
[12:18]<fzywjg>*your
[12:19]<whjr_09>already designed
[12:19]<whjr_09>lanceit.com
[12:19]<whjr_09>and uses tonnnns of css pretty much all of it
[12:19]<fzywjg>You know that HTML consists of more elements than just <div>?
[12:20]<fzywjg>That's not better than table layouts.
[12:20]<zwgyg>lol Frixon
[12:21]<ffrggnf>yeah, classes like "top-right-box-text" aren't exactly semantic
[12:21]<whjr_09>??
[12:21]<jvyajg7>That is absolutely horrible on 19"
[12:22]<whjr_09>yea i know
[12:22]<whjr_09>put it at like 1200 800
[12:22]<whjr_09>it will look beautiful
[12:22]<jvyajg7>Heh, looks so cool dragging between screens at diff resolutions
[12:23]<jvyajg7>I wouldn't say beautiful
[12:23]<jvyajg7>The right column could easily be reduced
[12:23]<ryddygxrgssjg>WHoa_04, not bad, could vary a bit more color though, it's kind of bright :)
[12:23]<whjr_09>i say beautiful maybe u jus dont like the colors / site but i like it just not in 800 600
[12:23]<whjr_09>jimmiehansson: i toned it down alot
[12:23]<whjr_09>it used ot be VERY BRIGHT
[12:24]<whjr_09>maybe you keep your monitor brightness on high
[12:24]<fzywjg>WHoa_04: If you have headlines, use <h1> ... <h6>, if you have lists, like your navigations, use <ul>, <ol> or <dl>. Normal text paragraphs are <p> elements, Layout images are to be embedded via CSS and not via <img>. <img> elements are used for content images. Don't use <br> to produce gaps. Use <strong>, <em> and so on the emphasize and accent words. And and and. AND: Validate! Your page has 57 errors!
[12:24]<jvyajg7>So much wasted space in "Job Categories" :|
[12:24]<fzywjg>WHoa_04: Have a look at what HTML offers you.
[12:24]<dzrjgsvrgvygn>how about this design http://www.myspacebro.com/viewride.php?rideID=2
[12:25]<jvyajg7>Frixon has a point. All I'm seeing is div div div div
[12:25]<whjr_09>i like the deisng alot .......
[12:25]<whjr_09>design
[12:25]<whjr_09>i know
[12:25]<dzrjgsvrgvygn>mine is all divs
[12:25]<fzywjg>WHoa_04: You can also have this design with semantic HTML.

Back to #php
Or go to some related logs:
#gentoo
#php
#gentoo
#blender
#netbsd